Ya. S. Benedyk, Ya. Т. Zheldak, М. Ye. Popovych


У статті досліджується еволюція механізму обмежувального припису для захисту жертв домашнього насильства. Авторами аналізується застосування механізму у США, Австралії, ПАР, Швеції, Великій Британії, Малайзії та Японії; проводиться аналіз перспектив застосування обмежувальних приписів в Україні з урахуванням законодавчих новацій, а також досліджується роль механізму обмежувальних приписів у виконанні державами міжнародних зобов’язань щодо захисту жертв домашнього насильства.

Ключові слова

домашнє насильство, обмежувальний припис, тимчасовий обмежувальний припис

Повний текст:



OSCE-led Survey on Violence Against Women - Main Report. OSCE. 2019. URL: (date of access: 25.10.2019).

Preventing and Combating Violence against Women. Council of Europe.URL: {"16800 160" : [0]} (date of access: 25.10.2019).

Про запобігання та протидію домашньому насильству: Закон України від 07.12.2017 р. № 2229-VIII. Відомості Верховної Ради України. 2017. № 5. Ст. 35.

Турлова Ю. Обмежувальний припис стосовно кривдника як спеціальний захід щодо протидії домашньому насильству. Вісник Національної академії прокуратури України. 2018. №4/2 (58). С. 20-31.

The official journal of the Midwestern Criminal Justice Association. URL: (date of access: 25.10.2019).

The role of prosecutors in relation to the rights of victims and witnesses in criminal proceedings: Consultative Council of European Prosecutors Opinion, 30.11.2017. № 12 (2017). URL: (date of access: 25.10.2019).

Marie M. Victim/Offender Contact and Repeat Domestic Violence Victimization. Journal of Crime and Justice. 2006. №29. P. 51–68.

Family Law Act. 1996. UK Public General Acts. Chapter 27. URL: (date of access: 25.10.2019).

Nicola Harwin. Putting a Stop to Domestic Violence in the United Kingdom: Challenges and Opportunities. Violence Against Women. 2006. Vol. 12. Issue: 6. P. 556-567.

National Centre for Domestic Violence. URL: (date of access: 25.10.2019).

Richardson K. L., Speed A. K. Restrictions on legal aid in family law cases in England and Wales: creating a necessary barrier to public funding or simply increasing the burden on the family courts? Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law. 2019. Vol. 41. Issue 2. P. 135-152.

Youth Law Australia. URL: (date of access: 25.10.2019).

Interim Family Violence Restraining Order guide. Legal Adi Western Australia. URL: interim-family-violence-restraining-order-guide (date of access: 25.10.2019).

Family violence data portal. Crime Statistics Agency. Victorian State Government. URL: (date of access: 25.10.2019).

Wangmann J. Incidents v. context: How does the NSW protection order system understand intimate partner violence? Sydney Law Review. 2012.Vol. 34(4). P. 695-719.

Reeves E. Family violence, protection orders and systems abuse: views of legal practitioners. Current Issues in Criminal Justice. 2019. Published online: 16.10.2019. DOI: 10.1080/10345329.2019.1665816

Tjaden P., Thoennes N. Extent, Nature, and Consequences of Intimate Partner Violence: research report. US Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs. 2000. P. 62.

National Statistics. National Coalition Against Domestic Violence. URL: (date of access: 25.10.2019).

When Men Murder Women: An Analysis of 2009 Homicide Data. The Violence Policy Center.2011. URL: (date of access: 25.10.2019).

The Violence Against Women Act of 2005 Summary of Provisions. National Network to End Domestic Violence. 2011. URL: summit/documents/policysup1.pdf (date of access: 25.10.2019).

Laws on Violence Against Women. Office on Women's Health, Office of the Assistant Secretary for Health, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. URL: (date of access: 25.10.2019).

Restrictions on the Possession of Firearms by Individuals Convicted of a Misdemeanor Crime of Domestic Violence. Criminal Resource Manual.The United States Department of Justice. URL: (date of access: 25.10.2019).

Mindlin J., Reeves L. Rights and Remedies: Meeting the Civil Legal Needs of Sexual Violence Survivors. The National Crime Victim Law Institute. Portland. 2005. P. 186.

Unites States of America: Constitution. 17.09.1787. Art. 4. URL: (date of access: 25.10.2019).

Full faith and credit given to protection orders. Unannotated Title 18. Crimes and Criminal Procedure. United States Code. URL: (date of access: 25.10.2019).

Restraining Orders. The Swedish National Council for Crime Prevention Report (2015:3). Enslish Summary. Stockholm. 2015. P. 24. URL: (date of access: 25.10.2019).

Lagom kontakt förbud. Justitie departementet L5. 28.05.1988. URL: (date of access: 25.10.2019).

Kontakt förbud: en handbok. Aklagarmynd igheten. Utvecklings centrum Göteborg. 2019. P. 131. URL: dokument/ handbocker/handbok-kontaktforbud.pdf (date of access: 25.10.2019).

Strand S., Fröberg S., Storey J. Protecting victims of intimate partner violence: Swedish prosecutors’ experiences of decision-making regarding restraining orders. Journal of Scandinavian Studies in Criminology and Crime Prevention. 2018. Vol. 19. Issue 2. P. 170-186.

Baseline report by the Government of Sweden on measures giving effect to the provisions of the Council of Europe Convention on Preventing and Combating Violence against Women and Domestic Violence. 04.09.2017. Group of Experts on Action against Violence against Women and Domestic Violence. P. 88. URL: (date of access: 25.10.2019).

World report on violence and health: summary. World Health Organization. Geneva, 2002. P. 54. URL: injury_ prevention/ violence/world_report/en/summary_en.pdf (date of access: 25.10.2019).

Violence Against Women in South Africa: State Response to Domestic Violence and Rape. Human Rights Watch. New York, 1995. URL: legacy/reports/1995/Safricawm-02.htm (date of access: 25.10.2019).

Constitution of the Republic of South Africa, 18.12.1996, № 108. Government Gazette.1996. № 17678. Vol. 378. P. 1-147.

Domestic Violence Act, 20.11.1998, № 116. URL: (date of access: 25.10.2019).

Survey on Violence between Men and Women. Gender Equality Bureau. Cabinet Office. Japan,November 2018. URL: Japan%20-%20Survey%20on%20violence%20between%20men%20and%20 women.pdf (date of access: 25.10.2019).

Kanoko Kamata. The Case of the Domestic Violence Movement in Japan. The Asia-Pacific Journal. 2018. Vol. 16. Issue 21. № 1. URL: (date of access: 25.10.2019).

Yachiyo Sudo. Domestic Violence and the Research of Social Work: A Standpoint of Researching. Journal of Women and Social Work. 2002. Vol. 4. P. 25-40.

Weldon L. S., When Protest Makes Policy: How Social Movements Represent Disadvantaged Groups. University of Michigan Press, 2011.P. 231.

Law for the Prevention of Spousal Violence and the Protection of Victims.Committee on Society of Cooperative Way of Life House of Councillors. Japan. URL: violence.pdf (date of access: 25.10.2019).

配偶者暴力相談支援センターの機能を果たす施設一覧 (List of facilities that function as spouse violence consultation support center). URL: (date of access: 25.10.2019).

Abdullah R, Raj-Hashim R, Schmitt G: Battered Women in Malaysia: Prevalence, Problems and Public Attitude. A summary report of Women’s Aid Organization. Malaysia’s national research on domestic violence. Kuala Lumpur, Women's Aids Organization. 1995. URL: Domestic+Violence_37_5_1.htm (date of access: 25.10.2019).

Othman S., Mat Adenan N. A. Domestic violence management in Malaysia: A survey on the primary health care providers.Asia Pacific Family Medicine.2008. Issue 2. DOI: (date of access: 25.10.2019).

Domestic Violence Act: Laws of Malaysia, 24.06.1994. № 521. Online Version of Updated Text of Reprint. URL: uploads/files/Publications/LOM/EN/Act%20521%20-%20Domestic%20Violence %20Act%201994.pdf (date of access: 25.10.2019).

Domestic Violence (Amendment) Act: Laws of Malaysia, 15.09.2017. № A1538. URL: (date of access: 25.10.2019).

Views of the Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women under article 7, paragraph 3, of the Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women. Communication №: 2/2003, Ms. A. T. v. Hungary, 26.01.2005. URL: (date of access: 25.10.2019).

Hungary: Domestic violence, including in Roma communities; legislation, including implementation; state protection and support services, particularly on Miskolc, Debrecen and Budapest (2016-July 2018). Canada: Immigration and Refugee Board of Canada. 22.08.2018. URL: https://www. docid/5b9bd7c24.html (date of access: 25.10.2019).

Case of A. v. Croatia (Application № 55164/08). Council of Europe: European Court of Human Rights. Judgment, 14.10.2010.URL: 16805a320f (date of access: 25.10.2019).

Конвенція Ради Європи про запобігання насильству стосовно жінок і домашньому насильству та боротьбу з цими явищами. Відкрита для підписання в Стамбулі (Туреччина) 11 травня 2011 р. Видавництво «К.І.С.», 2014. С. 81. URL: (дата звернення: 25.10.2019).

Creative Commons License
Ця робота ліцензована Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.